CLINTON'S MOXIE

Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign unexpectedly turned into a rank and file battle cry of resistance within the Democratic Party against the mafia like tactics and obvious manipulations of Obama, whose sole and primary purpose is, as I've said, previously, to split, divide and decimate the Party and will ensure a McCain victory, which is exactly what is being accomplished.
The longer Hillary persists, the more she becomes, unintentionally, a cult like symbol of resistance to the Democratic Party whores, pimps and prostitutes.
Her campaign has been transformed, unwittingly.
Since those, above, are so obviously determined to serve their masters and NOT give Hillary the Democratic Presidential nomination, i.e., to screw her, by hook or by crook, no matter which, how and what way they do it, Hillary has a personal choice to do something historic and important.
She can bolt the Democratic Party, tell all, spill the beans, bring her troops with her, ally with or run as an Independent, support someone else.
She could snub her nose and tell the Democratic Party to go fuck themselves.
The chance of this happening are probably less than 1% in 100.
But, it exists as an option, a possibility.
She could say she will no longer be a corporate whore, she will not be a Democratic doormat and will not fall on her sword for the Democrats. What would she lose?
She would sacrifice her career.
But, so what?
She would not be living on the street and she's old enough to be more concerned about her possible historical role and legacy than another million dollars in the bank.
This would be my advice to Hillary if I could talk to her.
Meanwhile, following from my previous posts and particularly the one below, headed, "A Cornucopia of Coincidences and Timing,"May 10, 2008, the following about Abkhazia and Russia was JUST highlighted on JBANC website.
(I did NOT see it posted on their website before I wrote my previous blog). Forget the "spin."
It's the source, the WashPost, that's important, a mouthpiece for Establishment, corporate policies, and, JBANC, an additional Establishment policy mouthpiece, which highlighted it.
They don't report events.
They make policy.
They present official, Establishment policies as news and tell you how you should think about it, the official spin/narrative, propaganda, historical whitewash, etc.
They prepare and brainwash people appropriately.
So, when they highlight something like the following, it's telling, broadcasting to everybody:

www.jbanc.org/abkhazia.html

While on the above subject of fictional narratives and spin, a reiteration of one more point of continued disinformation and reverse causal relationships that floats around everywhere.
As Layla and uruknet have pointed out repeatedly, on their website/blogspot, Iran's influence, its militias and government in Iraq were brought in with and by American collaboration and Iraq's "occupation authorities."
But, major, significant, elements of America's professional, career, military establishment continue to be and were very, very UPSET over the role Iran and it's militias, in particular, Sadr, were allowed to play in Iraq.
They were overruled by the civilian, political, coalition authorities, deals and machinations of Bush-Cheney, Bremmer, Chalabi, et.al.
The collaborationist policies with Iran emanated NOT from America's professional military, but, vica-versa, from the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld civilian, political entities, et.al, just the opposite of how it is often presented, as usual, which is why the official narratives, explanations, news reports and solutions seem often to contradict one another. Outsourcing the occupation to Iran was the obvious reason Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld et.al., felt they didn't need more American troops, in spite of what most professional, American military generals said.
This factor is aside from or in addition to Iraq's subsequent organized resistance.
The many region wide repercussions of this inane policy of Iranian collaboration has now backfired in their faces.
Thus, official policy is busy backpedaling, doing damage control, attempting to deal with the negative repercussions, while still, simultaneously, continuing the official narrative.
Again, why so many discrepancies and contradictions exist in the explanations and news reports.
This, along with many other reasons, including the Hillary fiasco, is why McCain will win the General Election.
McCain does NOT represent a continuation of the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld policies.
Just the opposite.
Not only will McCain win, but, I predict, with as high, possibly, as a 10% nationwide margin.