Wednesday, September 8, 2010
SOROS, CLINTON, IRAQ, RUSSIA, ARMENIA
ALL above intersect in today's post.
In Helmer's most recent article, to which I will link at the end, he has some interesting names.
Amongst all names mentioned in Helmer's article, encompassing those in embedded links as well, it really seems to me more a question NOT who is, but, rather who is NOT present or represented.
Everyone who is ANYBODY, it seems to me, accounted for, present and/or on a list.
First of all, cited or referenced in Helmer's piece is Eurasia.
This gets confusing to me as NUMEROUS covert think tanks, operatives and organizations like the Eurasia Foundation, Eurasia Group overlap and exist.
(Do searches on your own for the above names).
Many are attached to and/or or part of a George SOROS sponsored, so-called philanthropic, Open Society, Eurasia Group/Club empire, often with help, coordination, funding, assistance from the US State Dept and/or CIA.
They intersect and intertwine.
Our government REPRESENTS money and propertied interests, first and foremost.
So, NO distinction between public, state and private interests, except for TAXES emanating primarily, disproportionately, from working class constituents, recycled to promote and subsidize PRIVATE CAPITAL, their interests and expansion.
Socialism for the wealthy, privatization for the poor working class Suckers, Assholes, Doormats, Morons, Idiots:
Soros, by the way, just donated $100 MILLION for so-called "Human Rights," which means everyone can expect more covert ops, such as our Pink Elephant shenanigans, colored revolutions, Human Rights, labor fronts, etc.
Soros is a CURRENCY SPECULATOR, profiteer, par excellence.
Another dressed up NAZI in philanthropic garb.
Here are a few RANDOM, cursory selections, links, for anyone totally unfamiliar with the name SOROS, although I imagine he is quite notorious abroad.
While Wiki is NOT an authoritative reference, names and financial associations factually cited below make the fundamental point.
One can do further research and elaboration.
Please note, Soros is, as everyone who is anyone, well connected to/with both influential Establishment groupings, the Kissinger/Rockefeller CFR crowd and Carlyle Groups.
ALSO, SOROS is an avid supporter and backer of HILLARY CLINTON.
This is pertinent to TODAY'S main event, which I will feature subsequently:
Additionally, our US/EU sponsored NABUCCO gas pipeline, mentioned in Helmer's article, NOT mentioned, to be supplied gas emanating FROM IRAQ, which, as I indicated previously, held a big powwow recently between MAJOR NAZI Iraq traitor extraordinaire Hamid Jafar of Dana Gas/Crescent/Abraaj octopus fame, UAE/GCC and RUSSIAN big shot interests:
International private vulcher's carve out their respective MIDDLE EAST/IRAQ investment niche in the body of Iraq's carcass.
Even tiny ARMENIA gets in on the act, now represented in IRAQ.
Not exactly Armenia but a RUSSIAN ARMENIAN BUSINESSMAN, Murad Muradian of BAMO Group, to represent Armenia in Iraq.
Interesting, coincidental development along with Soros, above and below:
Here is Helmer's piece, to which I refer above and precipitated my BRIEF response and a few additional comments:
Now, the above can be considered more or less introduction, appetizer for the main course, below.
In conjunction with all above, US PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON happened to deliver a major foreign POLICY address, speech at the CFR TODAY.
Keep in mind content and contextualization from all preceding above and my many posts as background while listening to Clinton's one hour CFR POLICY address and subsequent discussion including a question and answer period.
Of course, one must ignore rhetorical propaganda.
Just grin and bear it.
Focus on underlying, substantive POLICY reflected in HILLARY'S presentation, sometimes more transparent, other times couched in obligatory rhetoric.
If anyone can stomach listening to the illiterate, juvenile platitudes, drivel and rantings of Unser Fuhrer Obooma, which I can NOT, Hillary is MUCH easier to digest.
She is articulate and one can discern POLICY underlying her oblique, but, occasionally, not so vague references.
Sometimes, she even approaches, dallies with being direct.
Basically, however, Hillary reaffirms or reiterates POLICY such as I have presented it on my posts, IF one knows HOW to read and interpret.
Overlay her speech with my posts, information and see with what you come up: